Ethical Analysis for Public Policy and Management- myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theEthical Analysis for Public Policy and Management. Answer: The first ethical dilemma present in the company includes the work of Harry. Although, Harry is a great programmer by profession, his skills of freelancing are to be considered. As an employee is bound to a company for his work, freelancing cannot be done whilst still under the supervisions of the company mentioned. This is the first ethical dilemma. This dilemma is mainly about the consultation services he is aware of and not the program creations. The next ethical dilemma is the consideration made by Jill. The IT security Head of FABIO needs to rethink the position Jack is in. As he has spent considerable amount of time in redesigning the software as well as testing it, the considerations made by her is to be changed. As seen in the case study, she rejects the proposition of Jack without saying any reasons for her actions. It is clearly evident that Jill do not likes the success and actions made by Harry. This is the next ethical dilemma in the case study. The next dilemma is the personal friendship dilemma. This is mainly used to denote the friendship between Brockley and Jill. As Brockley is the executive head of IT, his personal friendship can lead to an impact in the whole company. Due to their personal opinion, Harry suffered for the losses. Although, the reasons for the termination of employment of Harry were his freelancing services, the actions of Brockley are not justified. This section of the analysis discusses about the various issues related to the ethics and their analysis. This section discusses about the facts in the provided study. The first ethical dilemma present in the company includes the work of Harry. Although, Harry is a great programmer by profession, his skills of freelancing are to be considered. As an employee is bound to a company for his work, freelancing cannot be done whilst still under the supervisions of the company mentioned. The next ethical dilemma is the consideration made by Jill. The IT security Head of FABIO needs to rethink the position Jack is in. As he has spent considerable amount of time in redesigning the software as well as testing it, the considerations made by her is to be changed. The next dilemma is the personal friendship dilemma. This is mainly used to denote the friendship between Brockley and Jill. As Brockley is the executive head of IT, his personal friendship can lead to an impact in the whole company. All the three points discussed above raises an ethical dilemma. The main issue that was resulted is the termination of a dedicated and talented employee (Case Study - Transcript, 2017). The first dilemma has the possibility of harm to Harry. As freelancing cannot be facilitated, the main harm can lead to losing his employment. The second problem of Jill taking personal favor, the main potential harm is Jill losing her respect in the company and Harry losing his reputations. As he was concerned with the software for a long time, ethical issues like this will cause an impact in the mental well-being. This is evident by harry totally losing the prospects of the software development. The last ethical problem is the personal friendship among Brockley and Jill. This is the cause for terminations of Harry. The main harm was that of Harry losing his job. In addition, as the CEO of FABIO decided to employ Harry, the ethical dilemma due to the report of the case poses harm to Brockley as well as Jill. This can lead to both of them losing their respect in the company. The main stakeholders are Jill, Harry and Brockley. The major ethical dilemma is the presence of freelancing activities done by Harry. As an employee is bound to a company for his work, freelancing cannot be done whilst still under the supervisions of the company mentioned. As it is seen that both Jill and Brockley was not in favor of the activities done by Harry as well as his successes, the main ethical dilemma lies in this. As Harry gave them an idea about the major freelancing activities due to which they got an opportunity to fire him from the company (Case Study - Transcript, 2017).. This is the main ethical dilemma which is the root cause for all the problems. In case Harry did not consider the freelancing activities from his house, Jill and Brockley would not have the opportunity to terminate him. Thus, the major ethical dilemma lies in the fact of freelancing by Harry. Consequentialism: If freelancing activity is done by Harry, he will be the only one who will be harmed. As such, the other stakeholders will be given the chance for considering the termination of Harry. Thus, the main harm will be faced by Harry himself. In addition, the ethical dilemma of Brockley to consider the re-employment of Harry is also another reason where he will also be harmed. If the freelancing activities are not done by Harry, Jill and Brockley is the one who will be harmed. They will not be provided with the idea of terminating the employment of Harry and this is the main harm. In addition, Harry will also be harmed. As he made great software, it has to be used. In case Harry had decided to not do the freelancing activities by himself, it would have affected the mental well-being of him. In addition, the ethical dilemma of Brockley to consider the re-employment of Harry would not have been of any problem by Brockley. Alternative A results in the least harm among the two. It is seen that in A, the most harmed is Harry and Brockley whereas in B, the most harmed are Jill along with Harry and Brockley. If freelancing activity is done, Harry will benefit. As the main aim for such activity is the use of the created software, the main benefit will be of Harry. However, the benefit of Jill and Brockley to consider for termination of employment is also to be considered. Furthermore, if freelancing was not being done, Harry would not have been fired and he would not have come into the contact of the CEO of FABIO. Thus, it is the benefit for Harry for continuing the freelancing activities. In case the freelancing is not done, only Brockley will benefit. It is because he will not face the ethical dilemma of considering the re-employment of Harry. D provides the maximum benefit which can be seen by the above sections. Rights and Duties: Although, Harry is a great programmer by profession, his skills of freelancing are to be considered. As an employee is bound to a company for his work, freelancing cannot be done whilst still under the supervisions of the company mentioned. This is the right of the company to terminate the employment of Harry due to his neglected duties towards the company. Kants Categorical Imperative: If freelancing activity is done by Harry, he will be the only one who will be disrespected. As such, the other stakeholders will be given the chance for considering the termination of Harry. In addition, the ethical dilemma of Brockley to consider the re-employment of Harry is also another reason where disrespect is possible. If the freelancing activities are not done by Harry, Jill and Brockley will not be provided with the idea of terminating the employment of Harry. As he made great software, it has to be used. In case Harry had decided to not do the freelancing activities by himself, it would have affected the mental well-being of him which is the main disrespect to a programmer like him. H is preferable as an alternative as the amount of disrespects are less in this case. If freelancing is done, Harry will be the one to be affected. His terminations will be in order where he will be treated unlike others. If freelancing is not done, no one will be treated unlike others. L is preferable as no one will be treated unlike others. In case everyone did action for freelancing by Harry, he would have faced termination. In case nobody did anything, Harry would have considered the freelancing activities in his free time. N is preferable as it led Harry to receive the chance for re-employment by the CEO of FABIO. Discussion: Although, Harry is a great programmer by profession, his skills of freelancing are to be considered (Case Study - Transcript, 2017). As an employee is bound to a company for his work, freelancing cannot be done whilst still under the supervisions of the company mentioned. a) The proposition for the software had to be checked. This is the main decision for the ethical dilemma as the root cause for freelancing is the fact that Jill did not consider the ideas for considering the software of Harry. b) The first step is the consideration of the software checking to be applied for the company. The next step is the neglecting of freelancing activities as this the cause for termination of Harry. References: Case Study - Transcript. (2017). [ebook] Available at: https://1726012_1331071803_EthicsAssignment2017.pdf [Accessed 25 Sep. 2017]. Goetsch, D.L. and Davis, S.B., 2014.Quality management for organizational excellence. Upper Saddle River, NJ: pearson. Hffe, O., 2013. Anthropology and Metaphysics in Kants Categorical Imperative of Law.Kant on Practical Justification: Interpretive Essays, pp.110-24. Kant, I., 2014. The Good Will and the Categorical Imperative.The Ethical Life: Fundamental Readings in Ethics and Moral Problems, pp.87-99. Lawton, A., van der Wal, Z. and Huberts, L. eds., 2015.Ethics in public policy and management: A global research companion. Routledge. O'Neill, O., 2013.Acting on principle: An essay on Kantian ethics. Cambridge University Press. Pullen, A. and Rhodes, C. eds., 2015.The Routledge companion to ethics, politics and organizations. Routledge. Sherman, N., 2014. The place of emotions in Kantian morality. InKant on Emotion and Value(pp. 11-32). Palgrave Macmillan UK.